Dans Tous Les Sens
Hi. I'm Brian, and I'm not in the kitchen. Bienvenue à mon podcast, où introspection et rencontres s'entrelacent avec mes invités. Chaque épisode est une exploration unique d’échanges authentiques, de tentative d'humour, d’émotions sans filtre et d’histoires (parfois) captivantes. Entre amis, invités, et moments de réflexion personnelle, on aborde tout : le sens de la vie, ces petites choses qui agacent, et ces grandes questions qui nous animent.
Dans Tous Les Sens
Ep. 018 - Les chiasmes de Christophe et Brian
Christophe et Brian se retrouvent devant les micros de DTLS pour un 3e épisode, où il est question de Pringles, The Substance, TDAH, stupres, testaments, chiasmes, censure… et surtout de râler sur tout et rien.
Yeah. Yeah. Season two. No, it's the season two podcast. Ah, it's the season two? I should say September. Okay. I'm France, but I did the season one, eight episodes. It's a gross season.
SPEAKER_01:In two sense. In all directions.
SPEAKER_00:Two years. It's the two. No, I definitely think that the season two in September. My three with you.
SPEAKER_01:But a few years I'll see.
SPEAKER_00:I'm here the moment. There's a big fun fact for you. It comes. So we have two episodes. I think the first is the episode three. I'm not sure the title. The configuration of Christoph, because I've configured my Lord for not a few bidouillo. Super efficace. The super efficace, because we're going to bidouillate a little bit. And we have I don't know if it was the six, eight episodes. It's the eighth, I'm sure. The Pepits of Christophe and Brian. That's where we have. We have a little bit.
SPEAKER_01:I'm sorry.
SPEAKER_00:And the fun fact is that this episode is the two equated of all the episodes.
SPEAKER_01:What success!
SPEAKER_00:It's dangerous. Yeah, and the record is by Charlotte, the word of Charlotte. I don't see it. It has a very big word and said a bad thing and things interesting.
SPEAKER_01:You have the pub for my podcast.
SPEAKER_00:No, no, no, no, but all the episodes are cool. But it's right that the one was particularly because it was there a team and it was a little bit. I demanded who was strange with the episode is that it has a second time. A year after I remarked on the stats of this episode. So I don't know who it's ancient colleagues and feedback or not? No.
SPEAKER_01:No, it's not a colleagues.
SPEAKER_00:It's a connard.
SPEAKER_01:They're comments.
SPEAKER_00:No, but already we'll play, because that we find of all the ways. We'll get a mix, we'll get a pot pourri until we put my chaos. You can do an example of chaos, Christophe.
SPEAKER_01:Two for one, one for two.
SPEAKER_00:It's a contrepetie also. Okay. I'm saying, but in fact?
SPEAKER_01:But I'm not. So you know the hand or down the back.
SPEAKER_00:But it's something a question of the thing. I feel that it's interesting. But it's just a question of morphology. Yeah, but there's a person on the text that you say. Observe it. Okay, okay. But it's like the ball, I source by the row, I don't know. I've just remarked. And there are people. It's not discriminant, it's super discriminant. It's just a question of morphology, of the bouche. It's like that. It's like that. It's right, it's reasonable I remarked, right?
SPEAKER_01:I think I'm the only one to have remarkable.
SPEAKER_00:No, no, no, no, I remarked, but I say that there are people that are in it. But you can have a book. Ah, I'm sorry. Roger Federer, he sorry with the battery. It's like. I don't know. We'll see.
SPEAKER_01:We'll verify after this.
SPEAKER_00:That depends. Okay, interesting.
SPEAKER_01:It's not so much interesting.
SPEAKER_00:It's a tour of chauffeur.
SPEAKER_01:Okay, we'll pass.
SPEAKER_00:For those who don't know the Pringles. Sorry.
SPEAKER_01:It's a species of the channels.
SPEAKER_00:No, it's a chips, they are absolutely at that point that you can make in a tube. Wait, there's a tube that is a little type of ball of tennis.
SPEAKER_01:Ah okay, yeah.
SPEAKER_00:It's the sensation when you have a ball knob. Ah, you sniff. Oh later. So the Pringles. So they're the chips in effect. Say you for why?
SPEAKER_01:No. Tic tic tic tic tic tic tic tic.
SPEAKER_00:I don't see the fact that I went, but in fact they are not considered chips of patates, because there are only 4% of pommes of terror in the chips Pringle. What's what the rest? One idea.
SPEAKER_01:My friend. If you internally.
SPEAKER_00:It's interesting to see what are the 96%. It's both 96%. It's not both. It's the truck. And the thing is that you regard they have two form, they can in many. religious. It's not the miracles, they are.
SPEAKER_01:It's bizarre.
SPEAKER_00:It's a certain texture. The other part of the products, because it's a product Procter and Gamble. You look at all the products Procter, they have a particular way like the dentifrice. This is really calculated for the viscosity or the for example the gel of chair, it's calculated, but now they are the way is that you can eat more. So you have the gelatin, and you can create, and they have a squeeze in the gamel, and too facilitating. And in fact, okay, because they made it, they know that the people make it. It's gone that travel. Oh wait. It's my fun fact.
SPEAKER_01:It's super interesting.
SPEAKER_00:It's not already arrived, eternally, but a year I said we were in some because we had to pass it. It was a little stress.
SPEAKER_01:You talk about a person and he will say no, no, we don't think you said.
SPEAKER_00:I think that I feel a few, and with certain people it's very pronounced in the fact. And when we were 11 years, 12 years, and we did learn in class, I don't know if you want to go now. Where you see a life and you say, Okay, Olivier, Madame, Christophe, you listen. And the poor friend that we apply Jacques, it's not your name. The prof they learn more than the others, because he had a difficult thing, I think.
SPEAKER_01:Okay.
SPEAKER_00:And it's non-stop. No, we uh no, and it was not his fault, the post. But it was horrible, it's humiliation. He was rough, the poor. But it's an education.
SPEAKER_01:I think already they have. No, no, I think they have a little bit more. Come on, correctly.
SPEAKER_00:Neurodivergent? No. Wait, see if it's a difficulty, in fact. We because it's a handicap. And Charlotte of the episode 7 explicit. We can consider other things like a handicap. The trouble of the attention would be a handicap. Nimm's what arrives in the life, none of the children in the life. No, but not none of the children, but they're not allowed, and certainly have much difficulty than certain things. For example, I was diagnostic with trouble of the attention and hyperactivity when I had 25 years.
SPEAKER_01:It's right, it's a real thing. There's another pot who had been diagnostic also.
SPEAKER_00:I finally got my story and I do my theory. But in fact, I was diagnostic when I was and I had difficulty at the world. I didn't know, but I'm bullshitting a little bit. I was in the top tier, but it depends on the views that I had to do. And reciting a poem, I would have. For me, it's impossible. Pratically impossible. It's not my fault.
SPEAKER_01:It's actually handicappant.
SPEAKER_00:It's very handicapant. And it's amulet? No. No, but I've been diagnostic and I'm conscient of that, I accept a little bit that certain things that I don't have to do with other people are not really due to the voluntary or discipline.
SPEAKER_01:It's not my fault in fact.
SPEAKER_00:There's a part of me I'm sceptical.
SPEAKER_01:Not even. I agree. I don't have the problem. I imagine that it's not difficult to memorize these things that are evident.
SPEAKER_00:But in fact, Taddy is a little bit quite a phenomenon of mod or something.
SPEAKER_01:No, no, no, no, I think just it's an uh diagnostic, but the tard, at the quarantine, and uh it has sense because we're an hyperactive absolute, super maladie, all these characteristics of the person who has a trouble of the attention. Evidently we had been good, it was too hard. But it's the mean that was a while where he had a lot of things, like a port, a vases of two meters. It's very typical. So I say that because I have just now two person in my entourage. Well, they're a little bit the same age.
SPEAKER_00:But it's right, but it's a little bit more diagnostic now, and I think there are different reasons. The other is we don't know. The other thing is that I said in the world in France and probably in Europe in the year 90, 19, 90, then the day 2000, we have this, and I had an envoy special who said a little bit now we pose three questions. We're etiquette in a trouble of attention and hyperactivity, and the Ritalin, and in Italy, it was a little bit inverse where an awful who is a little hyper hyper, hop, the Ritalin. And uh, I think that it's the episode in which we are where we have a lot of stimuli. The telephone, email, so it's a little bit difficult, I think, now, to be concentrated, to be focused with all the stimuli around us. The lunes, the difficulty it's there are more in evidence. And uh the code.
SPEAKER_01:You turn on your history, it's so good.
SPEAKER_00:But if the podcast is appearing in two sense, it's not an hasard. Um diagnostic with a trouble particularly? No.
SPEAKER_01:No, no, no.
SPEAKER_00:She's a misanthrope. No, not particularly. We have a mother code that we were passing. And just I didn't say the definition, so I read. I went okay. We let the definition.
SPEAKER_01:No, no, that's it. Okay. When you say a thing and people don't know. You regard a film and at the moment you regard the definition of a film or a reference.
SPEAKER_00:You know that you're arrived to regard a film on regarding just the film phenomenon, to put your telephone or pause or something.
SPEAKER_01:Very difficult. Um I think to remark on the telephone because I've got an actor or an actress, I say, ah, but I've been here like what? And you know I put seven minutes to fou for me in what film or what the film I read the person. Okay. It worked super fun.
SPEAKER_00:But you arrive to read a film quite in a pause toilet, regarding an actor, I'm very sure to read the film on two, because I put so much at the television.
SPEAKER_01:I'm not really, so generally I pass one hour, one day and a half, it's not really the time of a film. If you have pause for drink at the end, I read even two. It's not genius for a film. It's kind of good to read in one.
SPEAKER_00:But it's right that the format of 90 minutes, 90, 10, 10 minutes, two hours, two hours, the format standard and long metrics. It's wonderful that it was.
SPEAKER_01:No, but you got the film, the two, it was a little bit more long. It was one year, one hundred and two, the itch, they are not very long for the time. It's at the time that the films have come to get in. Alright, in the year, it was already one hour and a couple of augmented, two hours. Now, the more film, a big film, it's two hours, two hours and eight years faster.
SPEAKER_00:But it's a great film of the film. There are many things to do, but it's like it's long.
SPEAKER_01:But in fact, it's difficult to do a film court now, I think. You read the ancient films, in an hour and a half, more than an hour and we're not. It's bizarre, it was cool.
SPEAKER_00:I think it depends on a year. I heard we said in the Getaka, which is one of my films preferred. One hundred and four, I think. And it was very good. The night I wanted to watch The Substance. You have? It's married.
SPEAKER_01:It's married, no, it's uh this cinema completely subversive, very exactly. I'm sure. I don't know that it's a film exceptional that I'm very bullshit. It's amusing.
SPEAKER_00:In fact, I really enjoyed the cinema, but a lot of that I respect them. It's a caricature, it evokes a theme interesting of the age, also for a fan who has 50 years, and in real time that it is very bad for presentation's show at the television. So it's replaced by a person. I told that it was particularly degulous. Dennis Quaid, I think, or Randy Quaid, I'm just the two and the fruit, where he watched a crowd and it's a great plant. And the crowd that it is dangerous, the mechanic. So I think that it's a caricature and another moment for that. It's an exaggeration and for me, this exaggeration has been all the film. And at a moment for me, it's really funny.
SPEAKER_01:It is not subtil the film.
SPEAKER_00:It is not in the subtility.
SPEAKER_01:It's like it's a film exceptional, because you literally very facilitating the criticism, I know. In the history or art, I think we have enough to change a little bit. And you know, because it's too difficult and we don't change, but you know, I don't know your comments. It's like it's deceiving.
SPEAKER_00:It's in the grotesque. It makes substance a bit, I think. No, but I think there are people who are encensed by the film. The critics are encessed by the film. No, no, it's possible.
SPEAKER_01:Wait, I don't think it is.
SPEAKER_00:When it transforms in monster ignoble.
SPEAKER_01:It's long. It's like it was completely, and that's what I've been asking. It's a little bit. It's nice. I really demanded on regarding how we can conclude if there's a moral, a thing. And in fact, no, the film is well, because it is just nice. I think it's a good thing for the film.
SPEAKER_00:Yeah, no, but the film is that it's difficult now to not be on your telephone, to go on one. It's like I'm a cinema, because it's a few. Exactly.
SPEAKER_01:I don't want to talk about it. I've been around the cinema because it could be horribly. But I recovered a bit on the tier, I work at Lausanne and we had the chance to have a cinematic with a magnificent cinema in the scene that's The Capital, and it's just genius. Evidently, there's the way art where you replace the great classics, but also it replaces films I'm sure that Gataka passes. In the films that I, for certain, I knew in DVD and ancient films, and which I've been in cinema, but probably so long that it's a cool together films on great écrans that we have at the television. So it's cool. And at the moment we find it's not really my truth, but it's for the friends. And I said, It's really the opportunity to read our friends that it's a cinema, like we had when we were. I said, but no, you're on a fan, it's shopping the bad place. And it's wonderful to see a film like that. It's always a pellicle. It was a digital. And at a moment you see the I don't know if you tell this, but it's like when he passed a projector to another, and there's a big boot that passes. It's what that explained. There are two projectors, two bands, two bobines, and a lever, it does pass the one to the other, it does it, it's a plant. And that's evident already. The reason for the which I want to say is that it's not share. It's 15 balls the season.
SPEAKER_00:That's it.
SPEAKER_01:It's acceptable because you're in the grand cinema, if you pay more than 20 balls, there's a chance.
SPEAKER_00:After the deal, it's right, you can achieve a pack of place.
SPEAKER_01:But after many films recently that I've had enough to wear in cinema. I feel like the I've seen it was a Dune or Top Gun.
SPEAKER_00:But Dune or Cinema, that's an experience. That's not true, it's too much. But you say that you can leave the intensity, there's two or three intensity, but it is the max.
SPEAKER_01:Oh no, it's important. You bought, you know, it's a little bit. It's very gas. I'm saying that I'll go to the cinema, in normal. With all these efforts appointed. It's very disagreeable. I recommend absolutely not that to person.
SPEAKER_00:No, but you'll read it the project, you can design it. But we know Interstellar cinema, it's ding.
SPEAKER_01:Ah, okay, I've got the cinema.
SPEAKER_00:Interstellar is ding. What I'm here at the cinema, it's also a nostalgia when we had two. It was cinema, the weekend, the sala went plenty. And we had an experience collective. Right.
SPEAKER_01:We had a cinema at the time which always was a cinema art and essay. It was real, but really. And the two, they had a good programming. So they had the early things that were. But you know, there were many films that I've known it had been a deciding that it was. I had a Blade Runner at cinema. Although it was started 20 years ago. I did say one thing. Uh it's married to rallied, but it's kind of very frankly.
SPEAKER_00:No, it's true. No, but I would not just rally already, but it's naturally.
SPEAKER_01:It's naturally that.
SPEAKER_00:It's more rally, I'm done.
SPEAKER_01:But in another way, you don't emerve the beauty of the things. That's the important thing.
SPEAKER_00:It's important the légèret, but I don't know the concrete.
SPEAKER_01:I said to a chaos for contraband.
SPEAKER_00:Try légères, it's a problem.
SPEAKER_01:No. They're not.
SPEAKER_00:No. I don't know if we have. There are expressions that I'm just ancient. It's ancient, right? It's just the image for me is horrible. The first time I understand for the first time in not so long that.
SPEAKER_01:Oh my god, but it's good. I don't know that personally.
SPEAKER_00:Excuse me, but we're not encountering the moon. She said what? There's a question for you, I don't know. I do not know.
SPEAKER_01:You're gonna put the Ritalin again.
SPEAKER_00:I put the Elvance now.
SPEAKER_01:Ah, I don't know.
SPEAKER_00:I don't know. You heard of that, yeah.
SPEAKER_01:But it does.
SPEAKER_00:There's plenty of medicine. No, no, no, I'm gonna do the Elvance the matter. It is enormously focalised, even if I'm productive.
SPEAKER_01:Cool.
SPEAKER_00:It's difficult to switch off. I've got this at the end of the day where I'm okay, I'm playing, it's not. No, I'm gonna continue, I'll be productive after very tight.
SPEAKER_01:Ah merde, and the summer.
SPEAKER_00:And for it affects the summer and after when I do the weekend I'm easy. Because it's amphetamine. It's pure, so you're a guedro.
SPEAKER_01:But it's cool that it exists. I'm totally for the medication when it functions and ask them.
SPEAKER_00:But I don't know how it function. I've got an episode. It's a bad episode. I started in a group of therapy of group with people who had the Tada, the TDAH. It was telling me. It's a little terrible. But we were all right. And then we're on a group of WhatsApp. At the time it was Tada blah blah blah, which I told it was an excellent name. And now it's Tada 2013 because the group was relaxed. And the conversations are difficult to understand. But in the conversations, to question, to repeat in manner simple.
SPEAKER_01:And why do you apply Vegas, the child? That's his name. Ah, he appeared like that.
SPEAKER_00:We have Vegas who has already been. At the base, my father would say Muffin.
SPEAKER_01:Muffin. That's right.
SPEAKER_00:He runs a muffin. But his name of naissance is Vegas. And when I went to Munich, his proprietor, we don't say proprietary. Some ex-main. Some ex-main who was Czech. He played Vegas. Vegas. And in fact, in the watch, we went in Vegas. It was a little bit drunk, we'll apply Vegas. And in fact, after we arrived at Muffin. Dans discussion that we can have, effectively.
SPEAKER_01:We don't make it in the podcast because it's not a good thing.
SPEAKER_00:No, we'll make it a discussion interesting. This is the opinion that's a good thing. But it's that is frustrating. I think the conversation that we have is important. But we don't make it because direct.
SPEAKER_01:No, but let's go, let's go. On the phrase that you should have. We'll descend the two days. So I'm not sure. And it's because it's a reflection. She's that. It's the 9th May. I don't know in what measure this information is interesting.
SPEAKER_00:But I'll not say. 9th May, Christopher. It's the new thing that I've done, so I don't know the anniversary.
SPEAKER_01:I made a notes with an uh an alarm. At 7 hours, I'm sure to not see it in the journey.
SPEAKER_00:My ancient chef at the FIBA, he wanted all the anniversary. And he did not do all the anniversary. And the matter he puts his cafe and he enjoyed a message to all these people. It's good, but the problem is when he says that he involves a message annual, and you respond and he went. Because he had his mission.
SPEAKER_01:Alright, I read and not the anniversary of people with which I enjoy a conversation. In the episode, it was the mod, not on Facebook.
SPEAKER_00:That's cool. You said that it was my anniversary, I had 20 minutes. I don't know if I can hear. I thought I was too on the page, but on the page of the notification that another person said Happy birthday, hope you're having a great day. It was seven years I was decided. If it arrived, what you would say with your resources?
SPEAKER_01:Oh that's what I said.
SPEAKER_00:Ah, but I'm not sure.
SPEAKER_01:You turn my boat and uh the rest of the material, so it's more important. I don't think it's important to that presence on life.
SPEAKER_00:No, but in fact a second, I made just the alert. Repetition. My anniversary. It's one of the options on meta in the case. You can assign a person. Because I don't know. I don't know what it is. But after the testament, in fact. It's funny that we're talking because here I had enough. I'm going to get my testament. Because if it arrives, it's in the mercy, a nice decision.
SPEAKER_01:I have a lot of things to regular, but it's not regular. And we don't know. But it will arrive at two moment, but it's more pretty.
SPEAKER_00:Yeah, and you say if there is a chance, one is clear for me, I'll profit to say, okay, we have a chance, so I don't know. Evidently, if you guard a sign, a library, a disc. For example, ordinator, disco du, email, telephone, I mean what I don't want to do is get a disco du with all that you can guard. And after the rest, venture, don't, brulle, but not guard. Because it's complicated when you have a decent and you reveal with those objects, the two are and it's in the garage.
SPEAKER_01:The things material in the event, the things.
SPEAKER_00:No, and I don't encombrate the view of those who are. No, but okay, but it's cloak, but at the moment. It's pretty. But no, but it's not a taboo not really on these things, I think. If you say we Brian won't get these material, he made the two.
SPEAKER_01:Brian would say a tomb in form of pyramid and two at the interior.
SPEAKER_00:And at my funeral, yeah. But just the departure of Michael Nyman, just the film Gataka that I remarked here.
SPEAKER_01:No.
SPEAKER_00:No.
